Soil Mechanics · Study · PE Civil: Water Resources and Environmental · FE → PE Prep
Soil Mechanics
4% of exam
Lateral earth pressure, consolidation and compaction, bearing capacity, settlement, and slope stability for water-resources structures.
5 concepts
A. Lateral earth pressure
Lateral Earth Pressure: Active, At-Rest and Passive
Earth-pressure coefficients (active, at-rest, passive) by Rankine and Coulomb, the pressure triangle and resultant thrust, plus surcharge, water, and wall friction.
Every retaining structure on the PE Civil exam — cantilever wall, sheet pile, braced cut, basement wall — is sized against the horizontal push of the soil behind it. That push is not a single number: it depends entirely on how much the wall is allowed to move. Let the wall yield away from the backfill and the soil relaxes to its minimum, the active state; push the wall into the soil and the resistance climbs to its maximum, the passive state; hold it perfectly still and you get the in-between at-rest state. The whole topic, covered in the NCEES PE Civil Reference Handbook §3.1 Lateral Earth Pressures, is fluency in three coefficients and the discipline to keep effective stress, water, and surcharge as separate bookkeeping lines.
At-rest pressure and K0
When a wall does not move — a rigid basement wall, a culvert, a tank wall braced top and bottom — the soil stays in its original at-rest condition and the horizontal effective stress is the at-rest coefficient K0
times the vertical effective stress. For a normally consolidated soil Jaky's relation
K0=1−sinϕ′
is the workhorse; overconsolidation raises it because the soil 'remembers' a higher past stress, so
K0
is scaled by
OCRΩ
with
Ω≈sinϕ′
. Because
K0
sits between
Ka
and
Kp
, a non-yielding wall always carries more lateral load than a flexible one designed for the active case.
K0=1−sinϕ′(NC),K0=(1−sinϕ′)OCRΩ(OC)
Rankine active and passive coefficients
Rankine theory assumes a smooth (frictionless) vertical wall, a horizontal cohesionless backfill, and a soil at the verge of shear failure. The active coefficient is the ratio of horizontal to vertical effective stress when the soil has expanded to failure; the passive coefficient is that ratio when the soil has been compressed to failure. They are exact reciprocals — Kp=1/Ka — and for a typical ϕ′=32∘ that gives Ka≈0.31 against Kp≈3.25, a tenfold spread that explains why passive resistance is so valuable and why you mobilize it cautiously (it needs large movement).
For a dry or moist cohesionless backfill the lateral pressure grows linearly with depth, pa=Kaγz, so the diagram is a triangle and the resultant thrust per unit length of wall is the area of that triangle, Pa=21KaγH2, acting at one-third of the height above the base. The passive resultant has the identical form with Kp. Locating the resultant at H/3 is what lets you take moments for overturning and sliding checks; getting that lever arm wrong is a classic stability-calculation error.
Pa=21KaγH2at3H,Pp=21KpγH2at3H
Surcharge and the water table
A uniform surcharge q on the backfill surface adds a constant horizontal pressure Δσh=Kq over the full wall height — a rectangle stacked on the triangle, with its resultant at mid-height. Water is the bigger trap: below the water table you must switch to the buoyant (effective) unit weight γ′=γsat−γw for the soil pressure and then add the full hydrostatic water pressure u=γwzw as its own triangle. Soil pressure uses K; water does not — Ka never multiplies the water term. Forgetting the water pressure routinely under-predicts the thrust by half.
Δσh=Kq,u=γwzw,σh′=Kσv′
Cohesion: tension cracks and 2c'√K
For a c′-ϕ′ soil, cohesion reduces active pressure and boosts passive pressure by the term 2c′K. In the active case the pressure is negative (tension) near the surface down to the crack depth zc=2c′/(γKa); soil cannot sustain tension, so that zone is ignored (or assumed water-filled if cracks open). On the passive side the same term is additive, pp=Kpγz+2c′Kp, giving cohesive soils meaningful resistance even at the surface.
pa=Kaγz−2c′Ka,pp=Kpγz+2c′Kp
Coulomb theory and wall friction
Rankine ignores friction between wall and soil; Coulomb does not. Coulomb's wedge analysis admits wall friction δ, a battered wall face θ, and a sloping backfill β, and is the basis for the design charts engineers actually use. Wall friction lowers the active coefficient (the friction helps hold the wedge) and the resultant tilts at angle δ to the wall normal, so a fraction of the thrust acts downward — stabilizing against overturning. For a vertical wall with horizontal backfill and δ=0, Coulomb collapses exactly back to Rankine.
First decide the state from the wall's freedom to move: rigid/braced → K0; free to yield → Ka on the driving side and Kp on the resisting side. Compute Ka and Kp from ϕ′ and remember they are reciprocals as a fast check. Build the pressure diagram in separate strips — moist soil, buoyant soil, surcharge rectangle (Kq), water triangle (γwzw, no K) — find each resultant and its own lever arm, then sum. Use Rankine unless the problem explicitly gives wall friction δ or a sloping wall/backfill, in which case it wants Coulomb (usually via a supplied chart). Keep γ vs γ′ straight below the water table; that single substitution is the most common point-loser in the topic.
Key equations
At-rest coefficient (Jaky)K0=1−sinϕ′
Normally consolidated soil, non-yielding wall. ϕ′ = effective friction angle. For overconsolidated soil multiply by OCRΩ, Ω≈sinϕ′.
Rankine active coefficientKa=tan2(45∘−2ϕ′)=1+sinϕ′1−sinϕ′
Active / passive pressure with cohesionpa=Kaγz−2c′Ka,pp=Kpγz+2c′Kp
Active / passive thrustPa=21KaγH2,Pp=21KpγH2
Tension crack depthzc=γKa2c′
Surcharge contributionΔσh=Kq
Constant added horizontal pressure (psf) from a uniform surface surcharge q; resultant KqH
Hydrostatic water pressureu=γwzw
Acts on the wall in addition to the soil pressure; K does NOT apply to water. γw=62.4pcf
Coulomb active coefficientKa=cos2θcos(δ+θ)[1+cos(δ+θ)cos(θ−β)sin(ϕ′+δ)sin(ϕ′−β)]2cos2(ϕ′−θ)
Worked examples
Active thrust on a smooth cantilever wall
Problem. A 18 ft high wall retains a dry cohesionless backfill with ϕ′=32∘ and γ=120pcf. Using Rankine theory, find the active earth-pressure coefficient, the pressure at the base, and the resultant thrust and its point of application.
Problem. A 20 ft wall retains sand with ϕ′=30∘. The top 8 ft is moist (γ=120pcf); below the water table (8 ft depth) the sand is saturated (γsat=125pcf
Passive resistance and at-rest pressure
Problem. Dense sand has ϕ′=36∘, γ=125pcf, and is normally consolidated. For a 10 ft embedment, compare Ka
Coulomb versus Rankine with wall friction
Problem. A vertical wall (θ=0) retains horizontal granular backfill (β=0) with ϕ′=34∘
Common pitfalls
•Applying the earth-pressure coefficient to the water pressure. Soil uses K; water is full hydrostatic γwzw with no K. Keep them as separate diagrams.
•Using total unit weight below the water table. Soil pressure below the table uses the buoyant weight γ′=γsat−γw; using γsat
•Confusing at-rest with active. A braced or rigid (non-yielding) wall carries K0 pressure, which is larger than Ka. Designing such a wall for Ka
•Placing the resultant at mid-height. A triangular pressure diagram has its resultant at H/3 from the base; only a uniform (surcharge) strip resolves at mid-height.
•Forgetting that mobilizing passive resistance needs large movement. Full Kp requires far more displacement than full Ka; many designs apply a factor of safety or a reduced Kp
•Mixing up Ka and Kp — they are reciprocals. Confirm Ka<1<Kp
•Ignoring the tension zone for cohesive backfill. Active pressure is negative down to zc=2c′/(γKa)
References
NCEES PE Civil Reference Handbook — §3.1 Lateral Earth Pressures
NCEES PE Civil Reference Handbook — §3.3 Effective and Total Stresses
FHWA-NHI-06-088/089 Soils and Foundations Reference Manual — Rankine/Coulomb development and retaining-wall design
B. Soil consolidation and compaction
Compaction: Proctor, Percent Compaction and Relative Density
Standard vs modified Proctor, maximum dry unit weight and optimum moisture, relative compaction, relative density of granular soils, and the zero-air-voids limit.
Unlocks with an access pass — one-time payment, no auto-renew. View passes
Pass holders
C. Bearing capacity
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (General Equation)
The general bearing-capacity equation, the Nc/Nq/Ngamma factors, shape/depth/water-table corrections, and gross vs net, ultimate vs allowable with a factor of safety.
Unlocks with an access pass — one-time payment, no auto-renew. View passes
Pass holders
D. Settlement
Effective Stress, Consolidation and Settlement
The effective-stress principle, the e-log p' curve, Cc and Cr, normally vs over-consolidated soils (OCR), primary consolidation settlement, and the time rate via Tv and cv.
Unlocks with an access pass — one-time payment, no auto-renew. View passes
Pass holders
E. Slope stability
Slope Stability: Factor of Safety, Charts and Method of Slices
Infinite-slope and circular-arc failure, the factor-of-safety definition, drained vs undrained (phi=0) analysis, Taylor charts, the ordinary method of slices, and pore-pressure effects.
Unlocks with an access pass — one-time payment, no auto-renew. View passes
Maximum resistance state; Kp=1/Ka. Mobilizing full Kp requires large wall movement.
Lateral pressure at depth z (psf). For cohesionless soil drop the 2c′K term. Use γ′ below the water table.
Resultant per unit wall length (lb/ft) for a triangular distribution; acts at H/3 above the base.
Depth over which active pressure is tensile (ignored in design) for a cohesive backfill.
at mid-height.
.
δ = wall friction, θ = wall batter from vertical, β = backfill slope. Reduces to Rankine when δ=θ=β=0.
(check:
1+sin32∘1−sin32∘=1.5300.470=0.307
).
Pressure at base (
z=H=18ft
):
pa=KaγH=0.307(120)(18)=664psf
.
Resultant:
Pa=21KaγH2=21(0.307)(120)(18)2=5,970lb/ft
, acting at
H/3=6.00ft
above the base.
Sanity check:
Pa
is also the triangle area
21(664)(18)=5,980lb/ft
(rounding) — consistent. Final:
Ka=0.307
,
Pa≈5,970lb/ft
at
6.00ft
.
). A uniform surcharge
q=300psf
acts on the surface. Find the total horizontal thrust per foot of wall.
Solution. Ka=tan2(45∘−15∘)=31=0.333.
Use effective stress for soil; add water separately. At the surface pa=Kaq=0.333(300)=100psf.
At the water table (8 ft): σv′=120(8)+300=1,260psf, so pa=0.333(1,260)=420psf.
At the base (20 ft): σv′=120(8)+(125−62.4)(12)+300=2,011psf, so pa=0.333(2,011)=670psf; water u=62.4(12)=749psf.
Areas: upper strip 21(100+420)(8)=2,080; lower soil strip 21(420+670)(12)=6,540; water triangle 21(749)(12)=4,490lb/ft.
Total =2,080+6,540+4,490=13,100lb/ft.
Sanity check: the water alone (4,490 lb/ft) is over a third of the total — exactly why neglecting it is dangerous. Final: P≈13,100lb/ft.
,
K0
, and
Kp
, and find the passive resultant.
Solution. Ka=tan2(45∘−18∘)=0.260; K0=1−sin36∘=1−0.588=0.412; Kp=tan2(45∘+18∘)=3.85.
Note Ka<K0<Kp and Kp/Ka=3.85/0.260=14.8 — the full active-to-passive range.
Passive resultant: Pp=21KpγH2=21(3.85)(125)(10)2=24,100lb/ft, at H/3=3.33ft.
Sanity check: Kp=1/Ka=1/0.260=3.85 confirms the reciprocal relationship. Final: Ka=0.260, K0=0.412, Kp=3.85, Pp≈24,100lb/ft.
. Wall friction is
δ=32ϕ′=22.7∘
. Compare the Coulomb active coefficient with the Rankine value.
Solution. Rankine: Ka=tan2(45∘−17∘)=0.283.
Coulomb (with θ=β=0): numerator cos234∘=0.687. Denominator: cos(δ)=cos22.7∘=0.923; the bracket [1+cos22.7∘cos0∘sin56.7∘sin34∘]2=[1+0.9230.836⋅0.559]2=[1+0.711]2=2.93. So Ka=0.687/(0.923⋅2.93)=0.254.
Sanity check: wall friction lowers the active coefficient (0.254 vs 0.283, about 10% less) because friction helps support the failure wedge — the expected direction. Final: Coulomb Ka=0.254 vs Rankine 0.283.
double-counts the water.
under-predicts the load.
.
and
Kp=1/Ka
before proceeding.
; that tension cannot be relied on and is usually discarded.